Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101110110100101100… |
… | …0101100110000001100 |
3 | 100121112122221121220201 |
4 | 1131221120230300030 |
5 | 3121412344032002 |
6 | 114105413223244 |
7 | 10156531463533 |
oct | 1355130546014 |
9 | 317478847821 |
10 | 100552330252 |
11 | 3970a194a90 |
12 | 175a2931b24 |
13 | 963608778a |
14 | 4c1c55931a |
15 | 293798d087 |
hex | 176962cc0c |
100552330252 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 214260802560. Its totient is φ = 40694400000.
The previous prime is 100552330243. The next prime is 100552330379. The reversal of 100552330252 is 252033255001.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×1005523302522 (a number of 23 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 100552330252.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 10668502 + ... + 10677922.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2231883360).
Almost surely, 2100552330252 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
100552330252 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (113708472308).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
100552330252 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
100552330252 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 10223 (or 10221 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 9000, while the sum is 28.
Adding to 100552330252 its reverse (252033255001), we get a palindrome (352585585253).
The spelling of 100552330252 in words is "one hundred billion, five hundred fifty-two million, three hundred thirty thousand, two hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •