Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10110111110010100110110… |
… | …010011111111010110001110 |
3 | 111020202022221111111110202020 |
4 | 112332110312103333112032 |
5 | 101220414423303121040 |
6 | 554521050513111010 |
7 | 30165620544403353 |
oct | 2676246623772616 |
9 | 436668844443666 |
10 | 101040016848270 |
11 | 2a2159154484a5 |
12 | b3ba295258466 |
13 | 444c056b12a16 |
14 | 1ad4511b7062a |
15 | ba3439249cd0 |
hex | 5be5364ff58e |
101040016848270 has 16 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 242496040435920. Its totient is φ = 26944004492864.
The previous prime is 101040016848257. The next prime is 101040016848311. The reversal of 101040016848270 is 72848610040101.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (29) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1684000280775 + ... + 1684000280834.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (15156002527245).
Almost surely, 2101040016848270 is an apocalyptic number.
101040016848270 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (10) formed by its first and last digit.
101040016848270 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (141456023587650).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
101040016848270 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
101040016848270 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 3368000561619.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 86016, while the sum is 42.
Adding to 101040016848270 its reverse (72848610040101), we get a palindrome (173888626888371).
The spelling of 101040016848270 in words is "one hundred one trillion, forty billion, sixteen million, eight hundred forty-eight thousand, two hundred seventy".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.076 sec. • engine limits •