Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001001101010110100100… |
… | …0010000001001001001101 |
3 | 1022211221101122212220001000 |
4 | 2103111221002001021031 |
5 | 2311342000003201300 |
6 | 33311205534010513 |
7 | 2063335640305533 |
oct | 223255102011115 |
9 | 38757348786030 |
10 | 10125000053325 |
11 | 3253a96632213 |
12 | 1176362046a39 |
13 | 585a251bc811 |
14 | 2700a454c153 |
15 | 128593d60c00 |
hex | 9356908124d |
10125000053325 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 18644758246400. Its totient is φ = 5387019644160.
The previous prime is 10125000053281. The next prime is 10125000053341. The reversal of 10125000053325 is 52335000052101.
It is a happy number.
10125000053325 is a `hidden beast` number, since 1 + 0 + 125 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 533 + 2 + 5 = 666.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 10125000053325 - 215 = 10125000020557 is a prime.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (27).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 95 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 585488379 + ... + 585505671.
Almost surely, 210125000053325 is an apocalyptic number.
10125000053325 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (15) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
10125000053325 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (8519758193075).
10125000053325 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
10125000053325 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 19348 (or 19337 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 4500, while the sum is 27.
The spelling of 10125000053325 in words is "ten trillion, one hundred twenty-five billion, fifty-three thousand, three hundred twenty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.064 sec. • engine limits •