Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001001101110100110000… |
… | …0000010100011001010111 |
3 | 1022212201022101000101122111 |
4 | 2103131030000110121113 |
5 | 2312010043332100343 |
6 | 33315025552211451 |
7 | 2064043511245264 |
oct | 223351400243127 |
9 | 38781271011574 |
10 | 10133103003223 |
11 | 3257474526422 |
12 | 1177a43839b87 |
13 | 586716b6a025 |
14 | 27063277426b |
15 | 1288ba3e4c9d |
hex | 9374c014657 |
10133103003223 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 10133103003224. Its totient is φ = 10133103003222.
The previous prime is 10133103003203. The next prime is 10133103003227. The reversal of 10133103003223 is 32230030133101.
It is a strong prime.
It is a cyclic number.
It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-10133103003223 is a prime.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 10133103003194 and 10133103003203.
It is a congruent number.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (10133103003227) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 5066551501611 + 5066551501612.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (5066551501612).
Almost surely, 210133103003223 is an apocalyptic number.
10133103003223 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
10133103003223 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
10133103003223 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 972, while the sum is 22.
Adding to 10133103003223 its reverse (32230030133101), we get a palindrome (42363133136324).
The spelling of 10133103003223 in words is "ten trillion, one hundred thirty-three billion, one hundred three million, three thousand, two hundred twenty-three".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.072 sec. • engine limits •