Search a number
-
+
10312404161221 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1001011000010000101100…
…1011111101001011000101
31100111212010011202221220001
42112010023023331023011
52322424300431124341
633533241510241301
72113021663036201
oct226041313751305
940455104687801
1010312404161221
11331651433a228
1211a6743356231
1359a5bca892a6
142791a1817b01
1512d3b15a8d31
hex9610b2fd2c5

10312404161221 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 10312404161222. Its totient is φ = 10312404161220.

The previous prime is 10312404161183. The next prime is 10312404161251. The reversal of 10312404161221 is 12216140421301.

It is a happy number.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 6329928924225 + 3982475236996 = 2515935^2 + 1995614^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 10312404161221 - 237 = 10174965207749 is a prime.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 10312404161221.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (10312404161251) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 5156202080610 + 5156202080611.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (5156202080611).

Almost surely, 210312404161221 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

10312404161221 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

10312404161221 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

10312404161221 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2304, while the sum is 28.

Adding to 10312404161221 its reverse (12216140421301), we get a palindrome (22528544582522).

The spelling of 10312404161221 in words is "ten trillion, three hundred twelve billion, four hundred four million, one hundred sixty-one thousand, two hundred twenty-one".