Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100010110100… |
… | …10111100100010 |
3 | 21012222200001210 |
4 | 12023102330202 |
5 | 203011440412 |
6 | 14141010550 |
7 | 2365536123 |
oct | 613227442 |
9 | 235880053 |
10 | 103624482 |
11 | 53547675 |
12 | 2a853a56 |
13 | 18612480 |
14 | da9604a |
15 | 916d83c |
hex | 62d2f22 |
103624482 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 234984960. Its totient is φ = 30240000.
The previous prime is 103624481. The next prime is 103624501. The reversal of 103624482 is 284426301.
It is a super-3 number, since 3×1036244823 (a number of 25 digits) contains 333 as substring.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (103624481) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 137607 + ... + 138357.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3671640).
Almost surely, 2103624482 is an apocalyptic number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 103624482, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (117492480).
103624482 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (131360478).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
103624482 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
103624482 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 859.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 9216, while the sum is 30.
The square root of 103624482 is about 10179.6110927677. The cubic root of 103624482 is about 469.7002494913.
The spelling of 103624482 in words is "one hundred three million, six hundred twenty-four thousand, four hundred eighty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.085 sec. • engine limits •