Search a number
-
+
1054446087809 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11110101100000011110…
…00100110111010000001
310201210201011100020222202
433112001320212322001
5114234001144302214
62124223355042545
7136116104601632
oct17260170467201
93653634306882
101054446087809
11377208366584
12150437a40455
13785841b704a
143906d44b889
151c6665ea6de
hexf581e26e81

1054446087809 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 1054446087810. Its totient is φ = 1054446087808.

The previous prime is 1054446087797. The next prime is 1054446087811. The reversal of 1054446087809 is 9087806444501.

It is a happy number.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 1005647952400 + 48798135409 = 1002820^2 + 220903^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-1054446087809 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×10544460878092 (a number of 25 digits) contains 22 as substring.

Together with 1054446087811, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a Chen prime.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (1054446087889) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 527223043904 + 527223043905.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (527223043905).

Almost surely, 21054446087809 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

1054446087809 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

1054446087809 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

1054446087809 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 7741440, while the sum is 56.

The spelling of 1054446087809 in words is "one trillion, fifty-four billion, four hundred forty-six million, eighty-seven thousand, eight hundred nine".