Search a number
-
+
110002111012021 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11001000000101111011100…
…110000000101110010110101
3112102111002200020210022012111
4121000233130300011302311
5103404233310404341041
61025542134442051021
732112250600026544
oct3100573460056265
9472432606708174
10110002111012021
11320606a6a0a828
12104071904a9a71
13494c2017466b7
141d241b845615b
15cab619c02981
hex640bdcc05cb5

110002111012021 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 110002111012022. Its totient is φ = 110002111012020.

The previous prime is 110002111011983. The next prime is 110002111012067. The reversal of 110002111012021 is 120210111200011.

It is a happy number.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 89673059011396 + 20329052000625 = 9469586^2 + 4508775^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 110002111012021 - 27 = 110002111011893 is a prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 110002111011992 and 110002111012010.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (110002111010021) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 55001055506010 + 55001055506011.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (55001055506011).

Almost surely, 2110002111012021 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

110002111012021 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

110002111012021 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

110002111012021 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 8, while the sum is 13.

Adding to 110002111012021 its reverse (120210111200011), we get a palindrome (230212222212032).

The spelling of 110002111012021 in words is "one hundred ten trillion, two billion, one hundred eleven million, twelve thousand, twenty-one".