Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11000010001101100… |
… | …01001000000101110 |
3 | 1020122022110212100110 |
4 | 30020312021000232 |
5 | 203143011443202 |
6 | 5553141040450 |
7 | 640656220023 |
oct | 141066110056 |
9 | 36568425313 |
10 | 13033312302 |
11 | 5588a6848a |
12 | 26389b6126 |
13 | 12c926651a |
14 | 8b8d5b54a |
15 | 51433226c |
hex | 308d8902e |
13033312302 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 26171494272. Its totient is φ = 4326981984.
The previous prime is 13033312301. The next prime is 13033312337. The reversal of 13033312302 is 20321333031.
13033312302 is digitally balanced in base 5, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×130333123022 (a number of 21 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (13033312301) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 4118973 + ... + 4122135.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (817859196).
Almost surely, 213033312302 is an apocalyptic number.
13033312302 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (13138181970).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
13033312302 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
13033312302 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 5712.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 972, while the sum is 21.
Adding to 13033312302 its reverse (20321333031), we get a palindrome (33354645333).
The spelling of 13033312302 in words is "thirteen billion, thirty-three million, three hundred twelve thousand, three hundred two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.071 sec. • engine limits •