Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11000010011110110… |
… | …10101101100101000 |
3 | 1020200120121110121112 |
4 | 30021323111230220 |
5 | 203212132432300 |
6 | 5555025525452 |
7 | 641266341023 |
oct | 141173255450 |
9 | 36616543545 |
10 | 13051452200 |
11 | 5598228236 |
12 | 2642aa3888 |
13 | 12ccc480a7 |
14 | 8bb5201ba |
15 | 515c16e35 |
hex | 309ed5b28 |
13051452200 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 30344626830. Its totient is φ = 5220580800.
The previous prime is 13051452181. The next prime is 13051452221. The reversal of 13051452200 is 225415031.
13051452200 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 3 ways, for example, as 5310619876 + 7740832324 = 72874^2 + 87982^2 .
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 5 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 32628431 + ... + 32628830.
Almost surely, 213051452200 is an apocalyptic number.
13051452200 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (10) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
13051452200 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (17293174630).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
13051452200 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
13051452200 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 65257277 (or 65257268 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1200, while the sum is 23.
Adding to 13051452200 its reverse (225415031), we get a palindrome (13276867231).
The spelling of 13051452200 in words is "thirteen billion, fifty-one million, four hundred fifty-two thousand, two hundred".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.074 sec. • engine limits •