Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 111101000011110111… |
… | …0101100010001010000 |
3 | 110112110102001021021000 |
4 | 1322013232230101100 |
5 | 4122021300323432 |
6 | 140123305102000 |
7 | 12321300110460 |
oct | 1720756542120 |
9 | 415412037230 |
10 | 131126182992 |
11 | 50679348082 |
12 | 214b5a87900 |
13 | c4992c1cbc |
14 | 64bcca1ba0 |
15 | 3626b6c57c |
hex | 1e87bac450 |
131126182992 has 80 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 430149393280. Its totient is φ = 37464622848.
The previous prime is 131126182973. The next prime is 131126182997. The reversal of 131126182992 is 299281621131.
131126182992 is a `hidden beast` number, since 1 + 3 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 618 + 29 + 9 + 2 = 666.
It is a nude number because it is divisible by every one of its digits.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (131126182997) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 21677893 + ... + 21683940.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (5376867416).
Almost surely, 2131126182992 is an apocalyptic number.
131126182992 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
131126182992 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (299023210288).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
131126182992 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
131126182992 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 43361857 (or 43361845 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 93312, while the sum is 45.
The spelling of 131126182992 in words is "one hundred thirty-one billion, one hundred twenty-six million, one hundred eighty-two thousand, nine hundred ninety-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.074 sec. • engine limits •