Search a number
-
+
14683717124029 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1101010110101101000110…
…1111100011111110111101
31220222202020111022112211001
43111223101233203332331
53411034223040432104
651121335001530301
73043602125124352
oct325532157437675
956882214275731
1014683717124029
114751369570598
1217919771a3991
1382688cb54225
1438a9a5008629
151a6e55734aa4
hexd5ad1be3fbd

14683717124029 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 14683717124030. Its totient is φ = 14683717124028.

The previous prime is 14683717123993. The next prime is 14683717124033. The reversal of 14683717124029 is 92042171738641.

It is a happy number.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 14683227696900 + 489427129 = 3831870^2 + 22123^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 14683717124029 - 215 = 14683717091261 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×146837171240292 (a number of 27 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (14683717124059) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (29) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 7341858562014 + 7341858562015.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (7341858562015).

Almost surely, 214683717124029 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

14683717124029 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

14683717124029 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

14683717124029 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 4064256, while the sum is 55.

The spelling of 14683717124029 in words is "fourteen trillion, six hundred eighty-three billion, seven hundred seventeen million, one hundred twenty-four thousand, twenty-nine".