Search a number
-
+
16155114614269 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1110101100010110011111…
…0111100010110111111101
32010012102011201021122101021
43223011213313202313331
54104141133320124034
654205320204344141
73255111541334551
oct353054767426775
963172151248337
1016155114614269
115169389044a64
12198ab77245051
13902561585a37
143dbca9a87861
151d0371a016b4
hexeb167de2dfd

16155114614269 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 16155114614270. Its totient is φ = 16155114614268.

The previous prime is 16155114614251. The next prime is 16155114614291. The reversal of 16155114614269 is 96241641155161.

It is a happy number.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 8552758740100 + 7602355874169 = 2924510^2 + 2757237^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-16155114614269 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×161551146142692 (a number of 27 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (16155114614369) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (29) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 8077557307134 + 8077557307135.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (8077557307135).

Almost surely, 216155114614269 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

16155114614269 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

16155114614269 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

16155114614269 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 1555200, while the sum is 52.

The spelling of 16155114614269 in words is "sixteen trillion, one hundred fifty-five billion, one hundred fourteen million, six hundred fourteen thousand, two hundred sixty-nine".