Search a number
-
+
183261105421 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1010101010101100110…
…1101000110100001101
3122112000210002201212221
42222223031220310031
511000304320333141
6220104453255341
716145244460042
oct2525315506415
9575023081787
10183261105421
11707a2130a29
122b625934551
1314387459224
148c26d6d1c9
154b78b76bd1
hex2aab368d0d

183261105421 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 183261105422. Its totient is φ = 183261105420.

The previous prime is 183261105397. The next prime is 183261105451. The reversal of 183261105421 is 124501162381.

183261105421 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 173747248900 + 9513856521 = 416830^2 + 97539^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (124501162381) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 183261105421 - 25 = 183261105389 is a prime.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (183261105451) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 91630552710 + 91630552711.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (91630552711).

Almost surely, 2183261105421 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

183261105421 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

183261105421 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

183261105421 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 11520, while the sum is 34.

The spelling of 183261105421 in words is "one hundred eighty-three billion, two hundred sixty-one million, one hundred five thousand, four hundred twenty-one".