Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10010001110011000… |
… | …101101000100100000 |
3 | 1212111202222110111002 |
4 | 102032120231010200 |
5 | 310034042204140 |
6 | 12553441211132 |
7 | 1261634201264 |
oct | 221630550440 |
9 | 55452873432 |
10 | 19568709920 |
11 | 8332032441 |
12 | 3961630aa8 |
13 | 1acb22c0c6 |
14 | d38cd80a4 |
15 | 797e76415 |
hex | 48e62d120 |
19568709920 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 46546254720. Its totient is φ = 7774341120.
The previous prime is 19568709913. The next prime is 19568709983. The reversal of 19568709920 is 2990786591.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 18979805 + ... + 18980835.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (484856820).
Almost surely, 219568709920 is an apocalyptic number.
19568709920 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (10) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 19568709920, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (23273127360).
19568709920 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (26977544800).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
19568709920 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
19568709920 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1738 (or 1730 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2449440, while the sum is 56.
The spelling of 19568709920 in words is "nineteen billion, five hundred sixty-eight million, seven hundred nine thousand, nine hundred twenty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.072 sec. • engine limits •