Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100110000110… |
… | …1110101100110 |
3 | 1101121001220000 |
4 | 1030031311212 |
5 | 20103321442 |
6 | 1552122130 |
7 | 331552425 |
oct | 114156546 |
9 | 41531800 |
10 | 19979622 |
11 | 10306a93 |
12 | 6836346 |
13 | 41a7080 |
14 | 29212bc |
15 | 1b49d4c |
hex | 130dd66 |
19979622 has 80 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 49397040. Its totient is φ = 5997888.
The previous prime is 19979611. The next prime is 19979627. The reversal of 19979622 is 22697991.
19979622 is a `hidden beast` number, since 19 + 9 + 7 + 9 + 622 = 666.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (19979627) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 39 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 111529 + ... + 111707.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (617463).
Almost surely, 219979622 is an apocalyptic number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 19979622, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (24698520).
19979622 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (29417418).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
19979622 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
19979622 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 259 (or 250 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 122472, while the sum is 45.
The square root of 19979622 is about 4469.8570446939. The cubic root of 19979622 is about 271.3495396604.
The spelling of 19979622 in words is "nineteen million, nine hundred seventy-nine thousand, six hundred twenty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.078 sec. • engine limits •