Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101101100001011101111101… |
… | …001101100100011100111100 |
3 | 222020220002011121022111021022 |
4 | 231201131331031210130330 |
5 | 202220233134302242340 |
6 | 1545452042411123312 |
7 | 60112561014014444 |
oct | 5541357515443474 |
9 | 866802147274238 |
10 | 200212001212220 |
11 | 58880484193958 |
12 | 1a556516143538 |
13 | 8793baba7855a |
14 | 376245395b124 |
15 | 1822e90e233b5 |
hex | b6177d36473c |
200212001212220 has 12 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 420445202545704. Its totient is φ = 80084800484880.
The previous prime is 200212001212199. The next prime is 200212001212291. The reversal of 200212001212220 is 22212100212002.
It is a happy number.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 5005300030286 + ... + 5005300030325.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (35037100212142).
Almost surely, 2200212001212220 is an apocalyptic number.
200212001212220 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (20) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
200212001212220 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (220233201333484).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
200212001212220 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
200212001212220 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 10010600060620 (or 10010600060618 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 128, while the sum is 17.
Adding to 200212001212220 its reverse (22212100212002), we get a palindrome (222424101424222).
The spelling of 200212001212220 in words is "two hundred trillion, two hundred twelve billion, one million, two hundred twelve thousand, two hundred twenty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.078 sec. • engine limits •