Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101101100010111001001110… |
… | …100101001101111100010100 |
3 | 222021020110010112012202011201 |
4 | 231202321032211031330110 |
5 | 202223334341300131012 |
6 | 1550005051200242244 |
7 | 60122630416406650 |
oct | 5542711645157424 |
9 | 867213115182151 |
10 | 200310003130132 |
11 | 58908aa4772345 |
12 | 1a571506910384 |
13 | 87a01c96328ac |
14 | 37670ad4a1a60 |
15 | 18257c9a28857 |
hex | b62e4e94df14 |
200310003130132 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 424185888982464. Its totient is φ = 80797312186752.
The previous prime is 200310003130123. The next prime is 200310003130151. The reversal of 200310003130132 is 231031300013002.
200310003130132 is digitally balanced in base 3, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 210409666678 + ... + 210409667629.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (17674412040936).
Almost surely, 2200310003130132 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
200310003130132 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (223875885852332).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
200310003130132 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
200310003130132 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 420819334335 (or 420819334333 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 324, while the sum is 19.
Adding to 200310003130132 its reverse (231031300013002), we get a palindrome (431341303143134).
The spelling of 200310003130132 in words is "two hundred trillion, three hundred ten billion, three million, one hundred thirty thousand, one hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.102 sec. • engine limits •