Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101101101101001110011110… |
… | …111100111001110011011110 |
3 | 222100202022210220022202210122 |
4 | 231231032132330321303132 |
5 | 202322003000401321342 |
6 | 1551311153422034542 |
7 | 60225134342633453 |
oct | 5555163674716336 |
9 | 870668726282718 |
10 | 201020021120222 |
11 | 59062126383197 |
12 | 1a66703a418a52 |
13 | 8822150418605 |
14 | 378d5c708d82a |
15 | 1838ed33444d2 |
hex | b6d39ef39cde |
201020021120222 has 8 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 307219277561256. Its totient is φ = 98613595266472.
The previous prime is 201020021120197. The next prime is 201020021120249. The reversal of 201020021120222 is 222021120020102.
It is a happy number.
It is a sphenic number, since it is the product of 3 distinct primes.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 201020021120222.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (31) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 948207646688 + ... + 948207646899.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (38402409695157).
Almost surely, 2201020021120222 is an apocalyptic number.
201020021120222 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (106199256441034).
201020021120222 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
201020021120222 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1896415293642.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 128, while the sum is 17.
Adding to 201020021120222 its reverse (222021120020102), we get a palindrome (423041141140324).
The spelling of 201020021120222 in words is "two hundred one trillion, twenty billion, twenty-one million, one hundred twenty thousand, two hundred twenty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •