Search a number
-
+
20322323429 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10010111011010011…
…100000101111100101
31221110022000222212112
4102323103200233211
5313110003322204
613200321530405
71316414620232
oct227323405745
957408028775
1020322323429
118689470421
123b31aa3a05
131bbb3c0565
14dab02a789
157de1d926e
hex4bb4e0be5

20322323429 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 20322323430. Its totient is φ = 20322323428.

The previous prime is 20322323393. The next prime is 20322323443. The reversal of 20322323429 is 92432322302.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 11896919329 + 8425404100 = 109073^2 + 91790^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-20322323429 is a prime.

It is a super-3 number, since 3×203223234293 (a number of 32 digits) contains 333 as substring.

It is a Sophie Germain prime.

It is a Curzon number.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 20322323395 and 20322323404.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (20322323029) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 10161161714 + 10161161715.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (10161161715).

Almost surely, 220322323429 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

20322323429 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

20322323429 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

20322323429 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 31104, while the sum is 32.

The spelling of 20322323429 in words is "twenty billion, three hundred twenty-two million, three hundred twenty-three thousand, four hundred twenty-nine".