Search a number
-
+
217194211069669 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin110001011000100101110111…
…110011000100111011100101
31001111000120020000012211202101
4301120211313303010323211
5211432002221013212134
62045533350525212101
763514523011051411
oct6130456763047345
91044016200184671
10217194211069669
11632286029a8869
1220439839a01031
139426431927b12
143b8c3822c1d41
151a19abe811e14
hexc58977cc4ee5

217194211069669 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 217194211069670. Its totient is φ = 217194211069668.

The previous prime is 217194211069651. The next prime is 217194211069723. The reversal of 217194211069669 is 966960112491712.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 209776551832225 + 7417659237444 = 14483665^2 + 2723538^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 217194211069669 - 229 = 217193674198757 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×2171942110696692 (a number of 29 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 217194211069669.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (217194211769669) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 108597105534834 + 108597105534835.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (108597105534835).

Almost surely, 2217194211069669 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

217194211069669 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

217194211069669 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

217194211069669 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 17635968, while the sum is 64.

The spelling of 217194211069669 in words is "two hundred seventeen trillion, one hundred ninety-four billion, two hundred eleven million, sixty-nine thousand, six hundred sixty-nine".