Search a number
-
+
220112012210021 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin110010000011000011010010…
…010011000110111101100101
31001212100111120120211101211022
4302003003102103012331211
5212322303400111210041
62100050021254020525
764235365566404411
oct6203032223067545
91055314516741738
10220112012210021
1164152a86647688
122082b223647745
1395a8620900619
143c4d69a3bbd41
151a6a9429e324b
hexc830d24c6f65

220112012210021 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 220112012210022. Its totient is φ = 220112012210020.

The previous prime is 220112012210009. The next prime is 220112012210107. The reversal of 220112012210021 is 120012210211022.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 154407613279396 + 65704398930625 = 12426086^2 + 8105825^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 220112012210021 - 234 = 220094832340837 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×2201120122100212 (a number of 29 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (220112012210621) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 110056006105010 + 110056006105011.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (110056006105011).

Almost surely, 2220112012210021 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

220112012210021 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

220112012210021 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

220112012210021 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 64, while the sum is 17.

Adding to 220112012210021 its reverse (120012210211022), we get a palindrome (340124222421043).

The spelling of 220112012210021 in words is "two hundred twenty trillion, one hundred twelve billion, twelve million, two hundred ten thousand, twenty-one".