Search a number
-
+
2203322102329 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin100000000100000000001…
…110110011001000111001
321210122011022020211010111
4200010000032303020321
5242044400424233304
64404105303144321
7315120242600425
oct40040016631071
97718138224114
102203322102329
1177a4729826a7
122b70281450a1
1312ca06c03b6a
14788d9c61b85
153c4a7e1d704
hex201003b3239

2203322102329 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 2203322102330. Its totient is φ = 2203322102328.

The previous prime is 2203322102327. The next prime is 2203322102389. The reversal of 2203322102329 is 9232012233022.

It is a happy number.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 2199060623929 + 4261478400 = 1482923^2 + 65280^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 2203322102329 - 21 = 2203322102327 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×22033221023292 (a number of 25 digits) contains 22 as substring.

Together with 2203322102327, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 2203322102329.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (2203322102321) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1101661051164 + 1101661051165.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1101661051165).

Almost surely, 22203322102329 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

2203322102329 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

2203322102329 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

2203322102329 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 15552, while the sum is 31.

The spelling of 2203322102329 in words is "two trillion, two hundred three billion, three hundred twenty-two million, one hundred two thousand, three hundred twenty-nine".