Search a number
-
+
2222010202121 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin100000010101011010001…
…000001111100000001001
321212102101201012122121122
4200111122020033200021
5242401134102431441
64420435530045025
7316351325041403
oct40253210174011
97772351178548
102222010202121
11787392916676
122ba782879775
131316c4868088
147978dc09b73
153cbed8e834b
hex2055a20f809

2222010202121 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 2222010202122. Its totient is φ = 2222010202120.

The previous prime is 2222010201949. The next prime is 2222010202123. The reversal of 2222010202121 is 1212020102222.

It is a happy number.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 1840537208896 + 381472993225 = 1356664^2 + 617635^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 2222010202121 - 230 = 2220936460297 is a prime.

Together with 2222010202123, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a Chen prime.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 2222010202121.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (2222010202123) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1111005101060 + 1111005101061.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1111005101061).

Almost surely, 22222010202121 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

2222010202121 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

2222010202121 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

2222010202121 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 128, while the sum is 17.

Adding to 2222010202121 its reverse (1212020102222), we get a palindrome (3434030304343).

The spelling of 2222010202121 in words is "two trillion, two hundred twenty-two billion, ten million, two hundred two thousand, one hundred twenty-one".