Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100000101000000010001… |
… | …101111011000000010110 |
3 | 21221100000112121101100220 |
4 | 200220002031323000112 |
5 | 243213114043220002 |
6 | 4433544254015210 |
7 | 320660046455340 |
oct | 40500215730026 |
9 | 7840015541326 |
10 | 2242010132502 |
11 | 7949162a8358 |
12 | 3026247a7506 |
13 | 13356121a0ca |
14 | 7a72a0b4290 |
15 | 3d4be64d7bc |
hex | 20a0237b016 |
2242010132502 has 128 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 5287225881600. Its totient is φ = 620408388096.
The previous prime is 2242010132501. The next prime is 2242010132519. The reversal of 2242010132502 is 2052310102422.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (2242010132501) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 63 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 958532449 + ... + 958534787.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (41306452200).
Almost surely, 22242010132502 is an apocalyptic number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 2242010132502, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (2643612940800).
2242010132502 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (3045215749098).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
2242010132502 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
2242010132502 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 4950.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1920, while the sum is 24.
Adding to 2242010132502 its reverse (2052310102422), we get a palindrome (4294320234924).
The spelling of 2242010132502 in words is "two trillion, two hundred forty-two billion, ten million, one hundred thirty-two thousand, five hundred two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.065 sec. • engine limits •