Search a number
-
+
232400244121 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1101100001110000100…
…0100100110110011001
3211012212101001121210221
43120130020210312121
512301423430302441
6254432503440041
722535044324063
oct3303410446631
9735771047727
10232400244121
118a618974161
123905a456021
1318bb8a57066
14b369210733
1560a2b718d1
hex361c224d99

232400244121 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 232400244122. Its totient is φ = 232400244120.

The previous prime is 232400244119. The next prime is 232400244133. The reversal of 232400244121 is 121442004232.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 159891218496 + 72509025625 = 399864^2 + 269275^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 232400244121 - 21 = 232400244119 is a prime.

It is a super-3 number, since 3×2324002441213 (a number of 35 digits) contains 333 as substring.

Together with 232400244119, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (232400244101) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 116200122060 + 116200122061.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (116200122061).

Almost surely, 2232400244121 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

232400244121 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

232400244121 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

232400244121 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 3072, while the sum is 25.

Adding to 232400244121 its reverse (121442004232), we get a palindrome (353842248353).

The spelling of 232400244121 in words is "two hundred thirty-two billion, four hundred million, two hundred forty-four thousand, one hundred twenty-one".