Search a number
-
+
233011101101 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1101100100000010001…
…0110011110110101101
3211021102221111101001112
43121000202303312231
512304201320213401
6255013244321405
722556142452162
oct3310042636655
9737387441045
10233011101101
118a901768039
12391aab43265
1318c854845ac
14b3c63c2069
1560db5d63bb
hex36408b3dad

233011101101 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 233011101102. Its totient is φ = 233011101100.

The previous prime is 233011101091. The next prime is 233011101121. The reversal of 233011101101 is 101101110332.

It is a happy number.

233011101101 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 232202551876 + 808549225 = 481874^2 + 28435^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 233011101101 - 214 = 233011084717 is a prime.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (233011101121) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 116505550550 + 116505550551.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (116505550551).

Almost surely, 2233011101101 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

233011101101 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

233011101101 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

233011101101 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 18, while the sum is 14.

Adding to 233011101101 its reverse (101101110332), we get a palindrome (334112211433).

The spelling of 233011101101 in words is "two hundred thirty-three billion, eleven million, one hundred one thousand, one hundred one".