Search a number
-
+
2403343049 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1000111101000000…
…0001101011001001
320012111022110212112
42033100001223021
514410223434144
61034251552105
7113362036022
oct21720015311
96174273775
102403343049
111023696228
12570a5b635
132c3bb94a3
1418b28dc49
15e0ed699e
hex8f401ac9

2403343049 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 2403343050. Its totient is φ = 2403343048.

The previous prime is 2403343027. The next prime is 2403343081. The reversal of 2403343049 is 9403433042.

It is an a-pointer prime, because the next prime (2403343081) can be obtained adding 2403343049 to its sum of digits (32).

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 1886599225 + 516743824 = 43435^2 + 22732^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-2403343049 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×24033430492 = 11552115622353232802, which contains 22 as substring.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (2403343249) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1201671524 + 1201671525.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1201671525).

Almost surely, 22403343049 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

2403343049 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

2403343049 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

2403343049 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 31104, while the sum is 32.

The square root of 2403343049 is about 49023.9028332098. The cubic root of 2403343049 is about 1339.4872637341.

The spelling of 2403343049 in words is "two billion, four hundred three million, three hundred forty-three thousand, forty-nine".