Search a number
-
+
241311364621 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1110000010111101000…
…1110011011000001101
3212001212101220110001221
43200233101303120031
512423201202131441
6302505032003341
723301630520165
oct3405721633015
9761771813057
10241311364621
1193380a79958
123a926830551
13199a8c88422
14b9728cb5a5
1564251438d1
hex382f47360d

241311364621 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 241311364622. Its totient is φ = 241311364620.

The previous prime is 241311364607. The next prime is 241311364663. The reversal of 241311364621 is 126463113142.

241311364621 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 173984088996 + 67327275625 = 417114^2 + 259475^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 241311364621 - 229 = 240774493709 is a prime.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (241311364691) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 120655682310 + 120655682311.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (120655682311).

Almost surely, 2241311364621 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

241311364621 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

241311364621 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

241311364621 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 20736, while the sum is 34.

Adding to 241311364621 its reverse (126463113142), we get a palindrome (367774477763).

The spelling of 241311364621 in words is "two hundred forty-one billion, three hundred eleven million, three hundred sixty-four thousand, six hundred twenty-one".