Search a number
-
+
2506535341 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1001010101100110…
…1011000110101101
320110200111012002021
42111121223012231
520113133112331
61052415430141
7116054125132
oct22531530655
96420435067
102506535341
111076968112
1259b525351
1330c3aa00b
1419ac72589
15ea0bc211
hex9566b1ad

2506535341 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 2506535342. Its totient is φ = 2506535340.

The previous prime is 2506535329. The next prime is 2506535393. The reversal of 2506535341 is 1435356052.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 2485421316 + 21114025 = 49854^2 + 4595^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-2506535341 is a prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 2506535297 and 2506535306.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (2506535441) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1253267670 + 1253267671.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1253267671).

Almost surely, 22506535341 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

2506535341 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

2506535341 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

2506535341 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 54000, while the sum is 34.

The square root of 2506535341 is about 50065.3107550527. The cubic root of 2506535341 is about 1358.3904222442.

It can be divided in two parts, 25065 and 35341, that added together give a palindrome (60406).

The spelling of 2506535341 in words is "two billion, five hundred six million, five hundred thirty-five thousand, three hundred forty-one".