Search a number
-
+
2541224431 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1001011101111000…
…0000000111101111
320120002202120120101
42113132000013233
520201023140211
61100055131531
7116655023404
oct22736000757
96502676511
102541224431
111094500589
125ab073ba7
133166343c5
141a17022ab
15ed1705c1
hex977801ef

2541224431 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 2541224432. Its totient is φ = 2541224430.

The previous prime is 2541224429. The next prime is 2541224503. The reversal of 2541224431 is 1344221452.

It is a weak prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 2541224431 - 21 = 2541224429 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×25412244312 = 12915643217422547522, which contains 22 as substring.

Together with 2541224429, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 2541224431.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (2541224401) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1270612215 + 1270612216.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1270612216).

Almost surely, 22541224431 is an apocalyptic number.

2541224431 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

2541224431 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

2541224431 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 7680, while the sum is 28.

The square root of 2541224431 is about 50410.5587253305. The cubic root of 2541224431 is about 1364.6281966246.

Adding to 2541224431 its reverse (1344221452), we get a palindrome (3885445883).

The spelling of 2541224431 in words is "two billion, five hundred forty-one million, two hundred twenty-four thousand, four hundred thirty-one".