Search a number
-
+
2654704623421 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin100110101000011000101…
…110011101111100111101
3100101210020221002201011001
4212220120232131330331
5321443313340422141
65351315433130301
7362540024661064
oct46503056357475
910353227081131
102654704623421
11933943608664
1236a5bb259991
13163450850926
14926ba1d71db
15490c574ca31
hex26a18b9df3d

2654704623421 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 2654704623422. Its totient is φ = 2654704623420.

The previous prime is 2654704623419. The next prime is 2654704623437. The reversal of 2654704623421 is 1243264074562.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 2250735060025 + 403969563396 = 1500245^2 + 635586^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 2654704623421 - 21 = 2654704623419 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×26547046234212 (a number of 26 digits) contains 22 as substring.

Together with 2654704623419, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (2654704623401) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1327352311710 + 1327352311711.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1327352311711).

Almost surely, 22654704623421 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

2654704623421 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

2654704623421 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

2654704623421 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1935360, while the sum is 46.

Adding to 2654704623421 its reverse (1243264074562), we get a palindrome (3897968697983).

The spelling of 2654704623421 in words is "two trillion, six hundred fifty-four billion, seven hundred four million, six hundred twenty-three thousand, four hundred twenty-one".