Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011000001110000… |
… | …0000111000000000 |
3 | 21122022000100221222 |
4 | 2300130000320000 |
5 | 22030243234012 |
6 | 1205421534212 |
7 | 133232502131 |
oct | 26034007000 |
9 | 7568010858 |
10 | 2960133632 |
11 | 1289a11235 |
12 | 6a7414368 |
13 | 382366781 |
14 | 2011c9c88 |
15 | 124d1b972 |
hex | b0700e00 |
2960133632 has 40 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 5929790856. Its totient is φ = 1476237312.
The previous prime is 2960133613. The next prime is 2960133661. The reversal of 2960133632 is 2363310692.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×29601336322 = 17524782238595022848, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 2960133592 and 2960133601.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 195983 + ... + 210545.
Almost surely, 22960133632 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 2960133632, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (2964895428).
2960133632 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (2969657224).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
2960133632 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
2960133632 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 14978 (or 14962 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 34992, while the sum is 35.
The square root of 2960133632 is about 54407.1101235859. The cubic root of 2960133632 is about 1435.8324771018.
The spelling of 2960133632 in words is "two billion, nine hundred sixty million, one hundred thirty-three thousand, six hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.066 sec. • engine limits •