Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 111000100100… |
… | …0010011010000 |
3 | 2001210200202110 |
4 | 1301020103100 |
5 | 30043000042 |
6 | 2535345320 |
7 | 510034302 |
oct | 161102320 |
9 | 61720673 |
10 | 29656272 |
11 | 15816218 |
12 | 9b22240 |
13 | 61b46b9 |
14 | 3d1d972 |
15 | 290c09c |
hex | 1c484d0 |
29656272 has 40 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 76870080. Its totient is φ = 9852160.
The previous prime is 29656271. The next prime is 29656273. The reversal of 29656272 is 27265692.
It is a happy number.
It is an interprime number because it is at equal distance from previous prime (29656271) and next prime (29656273).
It is a Smith number, since the sum of its digits (39) coincides with the sum of the digits of its prime factors.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 29656272.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (29656271) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 16372 + ... + 18092.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1921752).
Almost surely, 229656272 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
29656272 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (47213808).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
29656272 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
29656272 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 2091 (or 2085 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 90720, while the sum is 39.
The square root of 29656272 is about 5445.7572476195. The cubic root of 29656272 is about 309.5319749859.
The spelling of 29656272 in words is "twenty-nine million, six hundred fifty-six thousand, two hundred seventy-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •