Search a number
-
+
31132320101 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11100111111101000…
…011000000101100101
32222100122221201112122
4130333220120011211
51002224333220401
622145121355325
72151326232431
oct347750300545
988318851478
1031132320101
1112226423973
12604a198b45
132c21b50aac
14171499b9c1
15c2324621b
hex73fa18165

31132320101 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 31132320102. Its totient is φ = 31132320100.

The previous prime is 31132320071. The next prime is 31132320103. The reversal of 31132320101 is 10102323113.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 25487803201 + 5644516900 = 159649^2 + 75130^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 31132320101 - 234 = 13952450917 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×311323201012 (a number of 22 digits) contains 22 as substring.

Together with 31132320103, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a Chen prime.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 31132320101.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (31132320103) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 15566160050 + 15566160051.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (15566160051).

Almost surely, 231132320101 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

31132320101 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

31132320101 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

31132320101 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 108, while the sum is 17.

Adding to 31132320101 its reverse (10102323113), we get a palindrome (41234643214).

The spelling of 31132320101 in words is "thirty-one billion, one hundred thirty-two million, three hundred twenty thousand, one hundred one".