Search a number
-
+
3164541461 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1011110010011111…
…0001001000010101
322011112122100210022
42330213301020111
522440110311321
61242003034525
7141264105254
oct27447611025
98145570708
103164541461
111384334924
1274396ba45
133b5805153
142203d879b
15137c46dab
hexbc9f1215

3164541461 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 3164541462. Its totient is φ = 3164541460.

The previous prime is 3164541421. The next prime is 3164541463. The reversal of 3164541461 is 1641454613.

3164541461 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 3159564100 + 4977361 = 56210^2 + 2231^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (1641454613) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-3164541461 is a prime.

Together with 3164541463, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a Chen prime.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (3164541463) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1582270730 + 1582270731.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1582270731).

Almost surely, 23164541461 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

3164541461 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

3164541461 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

3164541461 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its digits is 34560, while the sum is 35.

The square root of 3164541461 is about 56254.2572700058. The cubic root of 3164541461 is about 1468.1494384977.

The spelling of 3164541461 in words is "three billion, one hundred sixty-four million, five hundred forty-one thousand, four hundred sixty-one".