Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100101101111110101100001… |
… | …0010010001001110001111100 |
3 | 1121112121202110200021022200022 |
4 | 1023133223002102021301330 |
5 | 322004434420314320012 |
6 | 3134100251000551312 |
7 | 126636242646543620 |
oct | 11337530222116174 |
9 | 1545552420238608 |
10 | 332030001323132 |
11 | 96882150819492 |
12 | 312a577b782538 |
13 | 113363aa814828 |
14 | 5bdc4a2d43180 |
15 | 285bce0401472 |
hex | 12dfac2489c7c |
332030001323132 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 690713974917120. Its totient is φ = 136657087070400.
The previous prime is 332030001323107. The next prime is 332030001323143. The reversal of 332030001323132 is 231323100030233.
It is a happy number.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×3320300013231322 (a number of 30 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1459897907 + ... + 1460125322.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (14389874477440).
Almost surely, 2332030001323132 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
332030001323132 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (358683973593988).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
332030001323132 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
332030001323132 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 2920023402 (or 2920023400 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 5832, while the sum is 26.
Adding to 332030001323132 its reverse (231323100030233), we get a palindrome (563353101353365).
The spelling of 332030001323132 in words is "three hundred thirty-two trillion, thirty billion, one million, three hundred twenty-three thousand, one hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.084 sec. • engine limits •