Search a number
-
+
3331331230109 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin110000011110100010110…
…100001000100110011101
3102210110202012102200222012
4300132202310020212131
5414040031243330414
611030220433401005
7462452331146561
oct60364264104635
912713665380865
103331331230109
11107489a6a4983
12459774109165
131b21b277470c
14b73471b36a1
155b9c783a33e
hex307a2d0899d

3331331230109 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 3331331230110. Its totient is φ = 3331331230108.

The previous prime is 3331331230099. The next prime is 3331331230127. The reversal of 3331331230109 is 9010321331333.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 3168133005625 + 163198224484 = 1779925^2 + 403978^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 3331331230109 - 24 = 3331331230093 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×33313312301092 (a number of 26 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a Sophie Germain prime.

It is a Curzon number.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (3331331232109) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1665665615054 + 1665665615055.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1665665615055).

Almost surely, 23331331230109 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

3331331230109 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

3331331230109 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

3331331230109 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 13122, while the sum is 32.

The spelling of 3331331230109 in words is "three trillion, three hundred thirty-one billion, three hundred thirty-one million, two hundred thirty thousand, one hundred nine".