Search a number
-
+
3430830484189 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin110001111011001101011…
…011101010101011011101
3110010222120110211111221201
4301323031123222223131
5422202320100443224
611144033551555501
7502604114643463
oct61731533525335
913128513744851
103430830484189
111103009404179
12474b0222bb91
131bb6ab5ca6a4
14bc0a5926833
155e39cb10a44
hex31ecd6eaadd

3430830484189 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 3430830484190. Its totient is φ = 3430830484188.

The previous prime is 3430830484187. The next prime is 3430830484229. The reversal of 3430830484189 is 9814840380343.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 2724628916025 + 706201568164 = 1650645^2 + 840358^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (9814840380343) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 3430830484189 - 21 = 3430830484187 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×34308304841892 (a number of 26 digits) contains 22 as substring.

Together with 3430830484187, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (3430830484187) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1715415242094 + 1715415242095.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1715415242095).

Almost surely, 23430830484189 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

3430830484189 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

3430830484189 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

3430830484189 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 7962624, while the sum is 55.

The spelling of 3430830484189 in words is "three trillion, four hundred thirty billion, eight hundred thirty million, four hundred eighty-four thousand, one hundred eighty-nine".