Search a number
-
+
343416341 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10100011110000…
…001111000010101
3212221012100122202
4110132001320111
51200403310331
654024334245
711336663552
oct2436017025
9787170582
10343416341
11166938864
1297014385
13561bc648
1433875a29
1520237ecb
hex14781e15

343416341 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 343416342. Its totient is φ = 343416340.

The previous prime is 343416313. The next prime is 343416343. The reversal of 343416341 is 143614343.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 222636241 + 120780100 = 14921^2 + 10990^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (143614343) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-343416341 is a prime.

Together with 343416343, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a Chen prime.

It is an alternating number because its digits alternate between odd and even.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (343416343) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 171708170 + 171708171.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (171708171).

Almost surely, 2343416341 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

343416341 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

343416341 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

343416341 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 10368, while the sum is 29.

The square root of 343416341 is about 18531.4959191103. The cubic root of 343416341 is about 700.2831106523.

The spelling of 343416341 in words is "three hundred forty-three million, four hundred sixteen thousand, three hundred forty-one".