Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1110000001100110… |
… | …0100010010111000 |
3 | 100201101010120211222 |
4 | 3200121210102320 |
5 | 30202242024043 |
6 | 1421324411212 |
7 | 162203155232 |
oct | 34031442270 |
9 | 10641116758 |
10 | 3764798648 |
11 | 1662148a46 |
12 | 8909a6b08 |
13 | 47cc90b10 |
14 | 27a00b252 |
15 | 1707b5d68 |
hex | e06644b8 |
3764798648 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 8065733760. Its totient is φ = 1632024576.
The previous prime is 3764798617. The next prime is 3764798657. The reversal of 3764798648 is 8468974673.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 982865 + ... + 986687.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (126027090).
Almost surely, 23764798648 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 3764798648, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (4032866880).
3764798648 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (4300935112).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
3764798648 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
3764798648 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 4416 (or 4412 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 48771072, while the sum is 62.
The square root of 3764798648 is about 61357.9550506697. The cubic root of 3764798648 is about 1555.6572523067.
The spelling of 3764798648 in words is "three billion, seven hundred sixty-four million, seven hundred ninety-eight thousand, six hundred forty-eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.068 sec. • engine limits •