Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011001010010000101… |
… | …00100000011011011110 |
3 | 1100122210100211220121120 |
4 | 11211020110200123132 |
5 | 22240314122041411 |
6 | 452054522511410 |
7 | 36463426220565 |
oct | 5451024403336 |
9 | 1318710756546 |
10 | 383465424606 |
11 | 138699265160 |
12 | 62399965566 |
13 | 2a211bb5614 |
14 | 147ba238bdc |
15 | 9e9500a106 |
hex | 59485206de |
383465424606 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 852420070656. Its totient is φ = 114027782400.
The previous prime is 383465424581. The next prime is 383465424637. The reversal of 383465424606 is 606424564383.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 747141 + ... + 1151151.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (13319063604).
Almost surely, 2383465424606 is an apocalyptic number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 383465424606, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (426210035328).
383465424606 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (468954646050).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
383465424606 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
383465424606 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 404297.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 9953280, while the sum is 51.
Adding to 383465424606 its reverse (606424564383), we get a palindrome (989889988989).
The spelling of 383465424606 in words is "three hundred eighty-three billion, four hundred sixty-five million, four hundred twenty-four thousand, six hundred six".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.070 sec. • engine limits •