Search a number
-
+
4041442132241 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin111010110011111000101…
…110010000000100010001
3112022100200001101010221212
4322303320232100010101
51012203333141212431
612332340214425505
7564661463215103
oct72637056200421
915270601333855
104041442132241
111318a697a5a38
12553312962295
1323414c88b987
14dd86d269573
15701d93aa72b
hex3acf8b90111

4041442132241 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 4041442132242. Its totient is φ = 4041442132240.

The previous prime is 4041442132223. The next prime is 4041442132297. The reversal of 4041442132241 is 1422312441404.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 4040116080016 + 1326052225 = 2010004^2 + 36415^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 4041442132241 - 226 = 4041375023377 is a prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 4041442132198 and 4041442132207.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (4041442138241) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 2020721066120 + 2020721066121.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2020721066121).

Almost surely, 24041442132241 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

4041442132241 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

4041442132241 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

4041442132241 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 24576, while the sum is 32.

Adding to 4041442132241 its reverse (1422312441404), we get a palindrome (5463754573645).

The spelling of 4041442132241 in words is "four trillion, forty-one billion, four hundred forty-two million, one hundred thirty-two thousand, two hundred forty-one".