Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100111011000100011… |
… | …110001000010101000 |
3 | 11001011010020221220100 |
4 | 213120203301002220 |
5 | 1143101204211412 |
6 | 31232105425400 |
7 | 3024635505540 |
oct | 473043610250 |
9 | 131133227810 |
10 | 42287960232 |
11 | 16a304a6471 |
12 | 824219b260 |
13 | 3cac0a059b |
14 | 20923c4320 |
15 | 11777caedc |
hex | 9d88f10a8 |
42287960232 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 130978224000. Its totient is φ = 12074251392.
The previous prime is 42287960213. The next prime is 42287960243. The reversal of 42287960232 is 23206978224.
42287960232 is a `hidden beast` number, since 4 + 2 + 2 + 8 + 7 + 9 + 602 + 32 = 666.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 753613 + ... + 807779.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1364356500).
Almost surely, 242287960232 is an apocalyptic number.
42287960232 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (42) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 42287960232, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (65489112000).
42287960232 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (88690263768).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
42287960232 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
42287960232 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 55735 (or 55728 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 580608, while the sum is 45.
The spelling of 42287960232 in words is "forty-two billion, two hundred eighty-seven million, nine hundred sixty thousand, two hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.077 sec. • engine limits •