Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10100101100111101100110… |
… | …10010100010101010101010 |
3 | 12222012011221001112002000020 |
4 | 22112132303102202222222 |
5 | 21431341422241240204 |
6 | 240454021541021310 |
7 | 12406046006112054 |
oct | 1226366322425252 |
9 | 188164831462006 |
10 | 45525366352554 |
11 | 1356222150a160 |
12 | 51331550b4836 |
13 | 1c5303cba335a |
14 | b35621d548d4 |
15 | 53e344eacbd9 |
hex | 2967b34a2aaa |
45525366352554 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 99965728962432. Its totient is φ = 13707010886400.
The previous prime is 45525366352553. The next prime is 45525366352621.
It is a happy number.
45525366352554 is nontrivially palindromic in base 10.
45525366352554 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (45525366352553) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 230735664 + ... + 230932884.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1561964515038).
Almost surely, 245525366352554 is an apocalyptic number.
45525366352554 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (54440362609878).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
45525366352554 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
45525366352554 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 219671.
The product of its digits is 324000000, while the sum is 60.
The spelling of 45525366352554 in words is "forty-five trillion, five hundred twenty-five billion, three hundred sixty-six million, three hundred fifty-two thousand, five hundred fifty-four".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.081 sec. • engine limits •