Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1000101100010100… |
… | …00000101100011100 |
3 | 110001020012102122200 |
4 | 10112022000230130 |
5 | 34024133042312 |
6 | 2051023211500 |
7 | 223434133113 |
oct | 42612005434 |
9 | 13036172580 |
10 | 4666690332 |
11 | 1a85252577 |
12 | aa2a46b90 |
13 | 594a9a535 |
14 | 323adac7a |
15 | 1c4a680dc |
hex | 116280b1c |
4666690332 has 72 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 12500744256. Its totient is φ = 1462831104.
The previous prime is 4666690309. The next prime is 4666690337. The reversal of 4666690332 is 2330966664.
It is a happy number.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (4666690337) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 966388 + ... + 971204.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (173621448).
Almost surely, 24666690332 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 4666690332, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (6250372128).
4666690332 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (7834053924).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
4666690332 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
4666690332 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 6427 (or 6422 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 839808, while the sum is 45.
The square root of 4666690332 is about 68313.1783186817. The cubic root of 4666690332 is about 1671.1021364445.
The spelling of 4666690332 in words is "four billion, six hundred sixty-six million, six hundred ninety thousand, three hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •