Search a number
-
+
490707629 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11101001111111…
…001101010101101
31021012100112022122
4131033321222231
52001110121004
6120405322325
715105642326
oct3517715255
91235315278
10490707629
11231a9a9a5
121184063a5
137a880659
144925744d
152d12ecbe
hex1d3f9aad

490707629 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 490707630. Its totient is φ = 490707628.

The previous prime is 490707619. The next prime is 490707673. The reversal of 490707629 is 926707094.

It is an a-pointer prime, because the next prime (490707673) can be obtained adding 490707629 to its sum of digits (44).

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 289918729 + 200788900 = 17027^2 + 14170^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 490707629 - 228 = 222272173 is a prime.

It is a Chen prime.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 490707629.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (490707619) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 245353814 + 245353815.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (245353815).

Almost surely, 2490707629 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

490707629 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

490707629 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

490707629 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 190512, while the sum is 44.

The square root of 490707629 is about 22151.9215645054. The cubic root of 490707629 is about 788.7528412274.

The spelling of 490707629 in words is "four hundred ninety million, seven hundred seven thousand, six hundred twenty-nine".