Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1111111001110010100… |
… | …11110001001100010100 |
3 | 1221020102010000102102222 |
4 | 13330321103301030110 |
5 | 32423033104031012 |
6 | 1055004542521512 |
7 | 54322566112610 |
oct | 7747123611424 |
9 | 1836363012388 |
10 | 546422330132 |
11 | 1a0811184198 |
12 | 89a97896298 |
13 | 3c6b1928583 |
14 | 1c638738340 |
15 | e331377972 |
hex | 7f394f1314 |
546422330132 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 1093581658176. Its totient is φ = 234023070528.
The previous prime is 546422330123. The next prime is 546422330141. The reversal of 546422330132 is 231033224645.
It is a happy number.
It is an interprime number because it is at equal distance from previous prime (546422330123) and next prime (546422330141).
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 546422330092 and 546422330101.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 6538073 + ... + 6621120.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (45565902424).
Almost surely, 2546422330132 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
546422330132 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (547159328044).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
546422330132 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
546422330132 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 13160687 (or 13160685 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 103680, while the sum is 35.
Adding to 546422330132 its reverse (231033224645), we get a palindrome (777455554777).
The spelling of 546422330132 in words is "five hundred forty-six billion, four hundred twenty-two million, three hundred thirty thousand, one hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.068 sec. • engine limits •