Search a number
-
+
680754081389 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10011110100000000001…
…10101110111001101101
32102002010220220102200112
421322000012232321231
542123141021101024
61240422322305405
7100116502134434
oct11720006567155
92362126812615
10680754081389
11242784a28138
12abb271b8265
134c26c088715
1424d3d23411b
1512a9464300e
hex9e801aee6d

680754081389 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 680754081390. Its totient is φ = 680754081388.

The previous prime is 680754081383. The next prime is 680754081431. The reversal of 680754081389 is 983180457086.

It is a happy number.

680754081389 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 641027612164 + 39726469225 = 800642^2 + 199315^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 680754081389 - 212 = 680754077293 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×6807540813892 (a number of 24 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a Sophie Germain prime.

It is a Curzon number.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (680754081383) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 340377040694 + 340377040695.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (340377040695).

Almost surely, 2680754081389 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

680754081389 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

680754081389 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

680754081389 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 11612160, while the sum is 59.

The spelling of 680754081389 in words is "six hundred eighty billion, seven hundred fifty-four million, eighty-one thousand, three hundred eighty-nine".