Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101001010110101101… |
… | …1001110001000000000 |
3 | 22111020020200121000012 |
4 | 1102231123032020000 |
5 | 2423340042040112 |
6 | 104444231444052 |
7 | 6262524351341 |
oct | 1225533161000 |
9 | 274206617005 |
10 | 88808940032 |
11 | 3473337110a |
12 | 15265b26628 |
13 | 84b413b077 |
14 | 4426a580c8 |
15 | 249ba0a022 |
hex | 14ad6ce200 |
88808940032 has 80 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 188029405080. Its totient is φ = 41759735808.
The previous prime is 88808940023. The next prime is 88808940037. The reversal of 88808940032 is 23004980888.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 4 ways, for example, as 45618125056 + 43190814976 = 213584^2 + 207824^2 .
It is a super-2 number, since 2×888089400322 (a number of 23 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (88808940037) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 13897094 + ... + 13903482.
Almost surely, 288808940032 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 88808940032, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (94014702540).
88808940032 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (99220465048).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
88808940032 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
88808940032 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 8021 (or 8005 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 884736, while the sum is 50.
The spelling of 88808940032 in words is "eighty-eight billion, eight hundred eight million, nine hundred forty thousand, thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.064 sec. • engine limits •